If a poll complaint gains support in California, it may be able to reform important trans legislation in the Golden State and, if it does, show the Democratic group that it is disconnected from voters ‘ views on the issue.
The three-part initiative, put forth by a group called Protect Kids California, calls for “girls ‘ athletic programs are for female athletes only,” “require schools notify parents when their child wants to socially transition in school options,” and “prevent child cleaning by prohibiting puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, or transgender surgeries on adolescents.”
LGBTQ organizations in California claim to be “monitoring” the plea, and the Los Angeles Times published a critical newspaper criticizing the initiative, saying it would “do away” with transgender youth’s rights and” all that enlightened stuff, making California more like Florida or Tennessee.”
However, according to Jonathan Zachreson, co-founder of Protect Kids California, the complaint, which was approved to obtain signatures at the end of November, has already received hundreds of files.
In reference to a bill from earlier this year that would have mandated courts take into account parents ‘ support of their children’s gender identity when deciding custody, among other legislation, Mr. Zachreson said,” In California, we’re kind of the central point where many of these horrible policies relating to youth and gender dysphoria are happening.”
According to recent poll, institutions should not keep gender identity information from parents, according to nearly 70 % of California voters. According to Mr. Zachreson, that polling data, along with other polls showing a “disconnect” between citizens and state legislators, was” the motivation for starting these initiatives.”
The petition was given the name” Restricts Rights of Transgender Youth” by the state attorney general’s office, which Mr. Zachreson claimed his group was considering suing before the program also made it to the vote.
Simply take a look at the judgment part in the LA Times, for instance. I believe that is proof that the program is tampering with the procedure, he said, adding that rather than “restricting” right, it is “protecting them.”
Knowing what is happening with their children at school is protecting filial right, according to Mr. Zachreson. ” It’s defending the private rights of female students and players.” Additionally, it is defending children’s rights to be able to maintain their privates and mature into adults who can reproduce properly.
According to California law, the attorney general’s office must publish “official titles and summaries describing the main objective and points of every proposed effort submitted in compliance with legal requirements,” even though it is unable to comment on specific initiatives.
Mr. Zachreson expressed his hope that the plea will reach the rest of the nation, particularly Democrat lawmakers, if it is successful in California.
According to him,” If we are effective in California, it will completely alter the course and talk on this issue across the nation and possibly abroad as well.”
The Sun reported that Equality California,” the nation’s largest nationwide LGBTQ+ civil rights organization,” is” properly monitoring” the situation.
The team’s communications director, Jorge Reyes Salinas, said, adding that” these are very risky times and quite scary days,” adding,” that we’re going into 2024 and there are people here in California who continue to vilify LGBTQ+ youth.”
Given that 69 percent of Americans in general help the LGBTQ+ community, he said,” We know that none of this love and anti-EQL+ language has a place these in California.” ” We’re collaborating with society partners to prevent this terrible aspect of history from occurring and prevent people from obtaining the names they seek.”
However, Mr. Newsom has received criticism for a bill that will force some suppliers to have gender-neutral toy parts. He signed the bill back in 2021, but it will come into effect on January 1, 2024. The law requires that stores with more than 500 employees operating in the state that sell” childcare items or toys for sale maintain a gender neutral section or area,” or the dealer could be subject to an$ 500 great.
According to the law, it is more challenging for consumers to compare similar products that are usually marketed for either boys or girls, and it poorly implies that using one gender is inappropriate.
It was impossible to reach a representative from Mr. Newsom’s department for post right away.
