The motivation behind the bill, according to an opinion by Cates in the newspaper next month, is the existence of “dreadful materials” that “encourage children to discuss’sexual pleasure’ and describe severe sex acts.” The Penistone and Stocksbridge MP claimed last month that online video was encouraging males to be trans women as a result of an interest in sex and physical culture war topics.
The FET has received praise in the Commons from Cates, who was contacted by The New European but made no comment. According to the organization’s personal financial audit, it gave her” a lecture on the subject of age-appropriate sex education components which was used by Mrs. CATS in a political conversation.”
” A national educational trust that researches the causes and consequences of family breakdown [and has ] no political or religious affiliations,” according to FET. It was founded in 1971 as The Responsible Society and was created to combat the impact of the so-called “permissive world,” which it believed promoted breakup, children born outside of marriage, abortion, and pornography. The Family Education Trust was the new name of the organization by 1999, and its stated mission was to” conduct or market research into the social, health, financial, or emotional effects of sexual behavior and to publish the results of such analysis.”
The vision statement also changed a year later, and FET now claims to “influence the public policy debate… by responding to government interviews and questions, engaging in speech with government ministers, peers and peers, as well as speaking out in the national media and media.”
The majority of the directors and advisors listed on their website identify as practicing Christians, and one of them is a Archbishop part, despite claiming no political or religious associations. Viscountess Brentford, a prominent Church of England part who formerly served on the Crown Appointments Committee, which selects priests, is one of their partners. The Institute of Economic Affairs ( IEA ) assistant director Robert Whelan and TaxPayer’s Alliance member Dennis O’Keeffe, another Tufton Street network of thinkers who frequently support ideas associated with the libertarian hard right, were previous sponsors.
Peter Williams, who is currently in charge of them, was previously the chairman of the anti-abortion non-governmental organization Right to Life. He has opposed the idea of requiring sex education in schools for more than ten times as a happy Catholic. He was prohibited from speaking at a 2013 UCLU Catholic Society function due to alleged bigotry. Williams described the restrictions as an “utterly abhorrent chilling of speech,” adding that it is ultimately anti-intellectual and insulting to treat people as though they are so overly sensitive that they will experience physical distress as a result of someone suggesting their chosen lifestyle and beliefs are incorrect. Williams was contacted by the New European for opinion on these issues, but he made no comment.
A thread that runs throughout FET’s materials and serves as the foundation for their complaints to teaching LGBT problems as part of RSE is this attitude and the idea that the LGBT community poses a risk to the family ( according to their description of it ). Tony Rucinski, one of their directors, frequently tweets his disapproval. Rucinski, a former CEO of the Board of Community Health Councils, also serves as the International Mission to Jewish People’s producer. This organization constantly works to win over Jews to Christianity. He referred to LGBT conversations in RSE training as “indoctrination” in a new message, adding that” we need an expanded type of area 28 banning all such “education” for pre-16s.”
Rucinski has even questioned the notion that children are born LGBT and vehemently opposes both mandatory RSE and same-sex wedding. He stated that “man-woman marriage” was crucial to the” good of the country” and that it “is at the heart of our culture combat” in an appearance on GB News this year.
Rucinski is a member of the Coalition for Marriage ( C4M ) along with several of FET’s other trustees. Andrea Minichello is the chairman of the Christian moralist organization Christian Concern, which has close ties to the Conservative Party and works to change the laws that permit LGBT relationship. Christian Concern just thanked Cates for her work on the RSE Bill on its site.
In an interview with Rucinski for the C4M site in July of this year, FET producer Williams asserted that “institutional capture of… the overall education sector… has led to self-identification becoming widespread within schools.” Children are identifying not only as distinct genders in a worrying grouping of cases, but also as “furries” or”animals”!
The claim that children who receive an LGBT-inclusive sex education are more likely to identify as animals has been extensively refuted, but the Daily Mail has repeatedly cited FET’s media officer as proof that this kind of scaremongering misinformation has played a crucial role in their ongoing success. A cartoon that taught kids how to masturbate was allegedly deliberately “encouraging kids under the age of consent to have sex,” according to a tweet from FET last month. Understandably, there is also no supporting data at all.
Another area where FET seems to be based its discussion on long-debunked claims is concerns about RSE lessons contributing to minor sex. The term “only you know when you are ready to have sex” was used to teach children about acceptance in a YouTube movie from last year, according to FET assistant Dr. David Paton, which appears to encourage them to engage in sexual activity before they are of legal age.
In the same conversation, he asserted that mandatory RSE was inadequate because, in addition to the UK seeing a decline in teen pregnancies, other nations that did not require it likewise did. He continued, rather startlingly, by asserting that cleaning gangs were less of a threat to child securing than RSE, saying that” Professional behaviour to minor sexual actions directly contribute to physical abuse.”
There is absolutely no proof, according to a 2018 UNESCO study, that sex education encourages young people to engage in sexual activity before. In fact, having sex education increases the likelihood that a young person will have their first sexual experience afterwards, when they are ready. Most important, first intercourse is more likely to become consented to, meaning it is desired and accepted.
FET is quite eager to explain to everyone what is wrong with RSE, but it digs deeply into their website to determine what it does deem acceptable. Numerous blogs and pamphlets that support the Christian classic community are available from the online store. It is not too late to stop the flood of sexual research among the young, according to one of their important texts, which was written in 1990. The squadrons of pushchairs that can be seen in any city center, being pulled around by young girls who rely on state benefits to succeed in a chilly and forlorn world, attest to the commercialization of sex education, according to later paragraphs.
Only the two student-focused links on FET’s site seem to be in reaction to this horror. One goes to the now-defunct American website” Love Matters,” which encourages abstinence and” Pro-Life Celebs” who “help save students from sexual crimes and abortion.” The other directs visitors to the peculiarly named Abstinence Clearing House, which only accepts VPN traffic and advertises” Abstinece Programs, Speakers and Components.”
There is no proof that having complete control over your son’s sexual exploration has any impact on adolescent pregnancy rates, despite the fact that contraception and “purity” are the cornerstones of the US Christian Best. However, there is overwhelming evidence that training RSE reduces sexual violence, results in fewer teen birth, and helps kids identify and report inappropriate physical contact. The propaganda at the heart of Cates ‘ strategy is also highlighted in a recent article in the Times Educational Supplement, which explains that all tutoring materials are now made available to parents on the websites of the majority of colleges.
The commitment of Cates et cetera. to portraying traditional educational methods as an abrupt, unanticipated assault on our kids has become crucial to the Christian right’s penetration of the Conservative Party. A number of traditional youth organizations have emerged over the past two years, and they have strong ties to both the alt-right and the Christian straight in the US. These intense theocrats could get influence in a post-defeat Liberal party that finds itself in search of new social ideas on which to base its comeback. They are devoted to portraying liberalism as the slippery slope towards” social Marxism.” They therefore offer a bleak outlook on the future for the right aircraft in Britain.
