This decision comes amid a backdrop of support from British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, who echoed Rowling’s sentiments, highlighting the importance of not penalising people for expressing views deemed as “common sense” regarding biological sex
J.K. Rowling, the renowned author of the Harry Potter series, will not face any legal consequences under Scotland’s new hate crime legislation following her controversial remarks questioning the gender identity of transgender women.
The comments, made on social media, were made on the same day that a new law aimed at preventing the “stirring up of hatred” based on various characteristics, including transgender identity, came into effect.
Rowling’s assertion prompted complaints to Police Scotland, but the authorities have deemed her comments as not constituting criminal behavior.
This decision comes amid a backdrop of support from British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, who echoed Rowling’s sentiments, emphasising the importance of not penalizing individuals for expressing views deemed as “common sense” regarding biological sex.
While Scotland’s First Minister, Humza Yousaf, has emphasized that the hate crime legislation aims to protect individuals from discrimination and hatred, he clarified that unless behavior is deemed threatening or abusive with the intent to incite hatred, individuals need not fear legal repercussions under the new law.
Women are not protected as a group, but the Scottish National Party-led government in Edinburgh is looking at separate reforms to target misogyny.
Scotland has been at the forefront of extending rights to the transgender community but a previous attempt to make it easier to change a legal gender was blocked by London over concerns it would impinge existing equality legislation.
The new hate crime law has also faced criticism over its impact on freedom of speech and concerns that it could be used to silence some views, including from those who advocate for women-only spaces.
Rowling tested the law by listing 10 trans women, including a convicted rapist, sex abusers and high profile activists, on X and saying they were men.
“Freedom of speech and belief are at an end in Scotland if the accurate description of biological sex is deemed criminal,” she said.
LAW GIVES POLICE ‘WRONG PRIORITIES’, PM SAYS
“I’m currently out of the country, but if what I’ve written here qualifies as an offence under the terms of the new act, I look forward to being arrested when I return to the birthplace of the Scottish Enlightenment.”
Scottish ministers have previously said misgendering people would not be an offence under the new law.
However, Minister for Victims and Community Safety Siobhan Brown told BBC radio on Monday it would be a matter for police to decide.
Sunak said Britain had a proud tradition of free speech and that the new law had given the police the wrong priorities.
“We should not be criminalising people saying common sense things about biological sex,” he told reporters.
“Clearly that isn’t right.”
India Willoughby, Britain’s first transgender newsreader and one of those who was listed by Rowling, questioned why anyone should “publicly denigrate and mock” trans people.
“What a sad pathetic sight. The best-known author in the world sitting up all night to write a mega-long troll post about me, because she’s consumed by a hatred of trans people. Completely deranged,” Willoughby said.
The Scottish Police Federation said officers were being asked to enforce new laws when resources were being cut.
“We are anticipating a high number of complaints in relation to social media posts and it is clearly going to create a lot of extra work,” it said.
With inputs from Reuters
