Wish to examine spiked ad- thoroughly? Become a rose follower.
Experts from the Netherlands’ University of Groningen reported last week that children and young people frequently go through transitions. In another announcement, water is wet.
This was the outcome of a 15-year much research, tracking more than 2,700 children from age 11 into their middle-twenties. The French researchers surveyed the subjects about their sexuality and identity every two to three years. Unsurprisingly, this research, which was published in the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior, revealed that gender confusion typically develops as a result of age. At the start of the studies, 11 percent of the kids expressed ‘sex non-contentedness’ to varying degrees. However, only 4 percent of 25-year-olds said they “frequently” or “often” felt unsatisfied with their identity.
The study’s findings may help children come to terms with the fact that it is common to have some doubts about one’s gender identity at this age and that it is also fairly common…
So far, there has been no commentary on this research from leading transgender activists. Nothing has been said by former Mermaids CEO Susie Green, the author of the warning that children could end up in murder without being fully committed to their “gender identities.” None of the trans-lobbyist organizations have released a statement refuting the claim that children who aren’t old enough to get a tattoo can make fatal medical decisions. Perhaps this isn’t surprising because trans advocates’ careers and self-image depend heavily on upholding the “trans child’s” fiction.
The numerous prominent public figures who claim to be serving the interests of so-called transgender children have also been remarkably quiet. Despite directing her 29 million followers on X to contribute to dolphins and criticizing JK Rowling for her gender-critical approach, actress Emma Watson has remained silent. Despite advocating for the use of puberty blockers for gender-confused kids, Nadia Whittome MP has continued to remain silent. Pertinently, the BBC also hasn’t found time yet to support this new research.
More research is needed to understand the French research. The findings are still significant despite just confirming what everyone with a brain knew. According to Michael Biggs, a professor of sociology at Oxford, I should say this:
It provides more proof of what we already know, it says. First of all, a sizable portion of children (11%) occasionally wish they were of the other sex. Next, that children who wish to get the same sexual are more likely to end up as gay, gay or bisexual. Third, the majority of children who want to be the other sex eventually develop into adults who aren’t interested in changing sex.
These details have been in the open eye for a while. For the past ten years, whistleblowing practitioners, scientists, and detransitioners have warned about the risks of naively affirming children’s personalities. The Tavistock clinic in London’s gender-identity development services (GIDS), which are now closed, show that the children who are overwhelmingly same-sex drawn are most likely to be placed on a medical pathway to “transition.” If left to figure things out, these kids would probably grow up to just be gay, gay, or lesbian, rather than transgender.
The gender-medicine machine’s youngsters are among the most vulnerable. A significant proportion of people even have autism, and many of them have a care background. Through youth, these children are more likely than the majority to have trouble accepting their names. They need compassion and support. Rather, they have been used as puppets.
This most current research ought to be ignored. Some people have ignored it. The research confirms the obvious: that growing away is a period of experiment, when children try on different personalities as they progress toward age. Adults have encouraged the widespread medicalization of what many young people may have perceived as a fad by affirming kids in their childish, mysterious belief that they are the opposite sex.
People have reneged on their duty to society’s most vulnerable. They have allowed a modern philosophy to take hold of them. And they have hidden their ignorance behind sparkle, colors, and clever phrases. A simple ‘sorry’ didn’t give the children experimented upon their reproduction, health, or self-trust back. But it would be a start.
Journalist Jo Bartosch is fighting for women’ and women’s rights.
