The latest Pride symbol, which has recently replaced the more well-known “rainbow flag” at some LGBT events in America, was made fun of by a standup comedian by the name of Paul Elia to an audience in Los Angeles next month.
Elia exclaimed,” It has about six more colors that stand for the transgender and intersex community.” ” I was keeping an eye on everyone while they had queer confidence outside my property.” … waving it in the air. Then I noticed some individuals flying the old queer flag. Is that, say, the queer confederacy? Elia enquired. What if there is a civil war between queer people?
The crowd laughed, but Elia had a point. On both sides of the Atlantic, there is a movement to detach the word dish that has come to be known as “LGBTQ+.”
The” T” and” Q” for transgender and queer do n’t necessarily have much in common with gays and lesbians, according to an increasing number of traditional LGBs.
For these intellectual reformers, the LGBTQ mash-up and community-wide fascination with trans issues is eroding much of the progress that sexual minority have fought to reach by causing confusion and chaos in politics and popular culture.
Their fledgling initiatives have sparked a surge in both online and offline advocacy that is pushing up against gender philosophy and igniting what is becoming known as “LGB Without the T.”
According to Kate Barker, CEO of the London-based LGB Alliance, which was founded in late 2019 to “advance the passions of lesbians, homosexual men, and bisexuals,”” we feel shackled into this” umbrella phrase” by organizations that are supposed to provide us but have really turned against us.” Many of us are now being forced into a relationship that we never agreed to and experience we cannot keep.
According to activists like Barker, the issue is not just about terminology.
The growing fame of trans and gay issues has led to a backlash against “middle-of-road” gay and lesbian social victories like parental rights and marriage equality.
Gays and lesbians are losing the long-time allies who have helped secure important civil liberties as issues affecting transgender people, such as room exposure and health treatments, drown out countless headlines.
There is a ton of evidence to back up claims that extreme parts are harming the public’s perception of LGBT people.
The largest single-year shift in more than 20 years was seen in the support for same-sex relationships, which decreased from 71 % to 64 % in just one year, according to a Gallup poll released earlier this year.
The decline coincided with an increase in Americans ‘ opposition to gender transition, from 51 % in 2021 to 55 % this year.
Eight out of ten Americans support public nondiscrimination laws protecting LGBTs, according to a survey done by the Public Religion Research Institute next year. However, this support wanes when special privileges for trans people, which the researchers define as “rights,” enter the picture.
61 % of people oppose boys participating in girls ‘ sports.
Perhaps a quarter of the Democrats polled gave negative responses to inquiries about transsexuals.
The group as a whole anticipated this change. The traditional gay author Andrew Sullivan wrote a bit for New York publication in January 2018 about the invasion of “gender philosophy” into the larger gay-rights activity and its potential for community-wide blowback. This was just one year under the Trump administration and three years after the Supreme Court legalized marriage equality.
According to Sullivan, the group’s growing fascination with trans issues had evolved into an overarching” criticism of gender, masculinity, feminine, and heterosexuality” rather than advocating for greater civil equality.
Sullivan continued,” The simultaneous rise of LGBT into a never-ending tongue-tussle was just advancing the type of “ideological magnetization” that works against immigrants “rather than unwinds it.”
Although Sullivan no more contributes to New York journal, his analysis of trans issues and their current enormous position within the larger LGBT ideas-sphere has never felt more foresight.
For example, the popular protest that Sullivan so foresaw was the Dylan Mulvaney and Bud Light tragedy from earlier this year.
The reply from their own group has been swift and cruel for those who want to do away with the T. Many people have reported death threats, doxing, online harassment, and physical violence in addition to claims of” transphobia.”
Barker claims,” We’re soon branded as “right flap,” which is a complete distortion of the truth.
For example, a group of TQ+ activists violently assaulted gay rights forerunner Fred Sargeant last summer for carrying an object that was antithetical to gender ideology while he was organizing the first Pride protest after the Stonewall Riots in 1969.
They took his sign, threw him to the floor, and doused him in coffee.
Sargeant’s position is not based on” transphobia,” like many others who want to reevaluateLGBT.
Sergeant, 75, told reporters at the time,” The concern I have is that the movement I knew, the gay liberation movement, has metamorphosized into a gender identity movement that is quite misogynistic, homophobic — values that I ca n’t share.” ” I no more understand it,” she said.
When 34-year-old Texan Rob Van Leuven started posting his aid for nixing the T on social media last year, someone similar happened to him. Van Leuven’s position is rooted as much in science as it is in worldview, like many others.
Being transgender is anchored in an alternate gender identity, while being gay is about same-sex attachment, and the two are not always compatible.
However, gay men who show no interest in potential transgender lovers are frequently charged with inciting hatred. Van Leuven remarked,” All I said was that gay men do n’t like]female body parts, which should be common sense.”
The end result: Trans activists launched a nationwide era plan to accuse Van Leuven of intentionally spreading HIV and having sex with children. Van Leuven claims he is considering lawful action. With so much of the LGB-only activity occurring online—for example, “drop the T” videos on Tik-Tok have been viewed over 7 million times alone—such activities are becoming more prevalent.
Transactivists like to assert that gays and lesbians “owe” their life and civil right to transgender people, in addition to the usual accusations of stigmatization.
Although they lack factual accuracy, their claims are replete with the intersectionalism and identity politics that characterize every modern political cause.
The L. G. B. T. Q. was led by” Queer People of Color.” A New York Times article from a few years ago read,” Charge, but Were Denied the Advantages.”
In fact, this story claims that a” transgender woman of color” threw the first brick at Stonewall, sparking the mob that took place in front of Manhattan’s Marblewall Inn in June 1969 and gave rise to the present gay rights movement.
Marsha P. Johnson, an African-American advocate and self-described drag queen, was the transgender person in question.
Johnson, who passed away in 1992, reportedly arrived at Stonewall a few hours after the mob first started, according to their own registration.
In fact, no one asserted usually until the movement to “elevate” Gay voices of color started to take hold about ten years ago.
However, the Johnson story has largely replaced known information, to the point where New York named the Marsha P. Johnson State Park in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, in 2020.
At the resort’s entry, there is a sign that warns customers that it is honoring” TLGBQ+ acceptance” and the community by adding the T to the front of the line. This sign serves as an indication of what is to come.
The 1990s saw the rise of queer theory—the intellectual theory that preaches natural sex and heterosexuality are basically social and cultural constructs—leached into the larger social arena, according to proponents of the T divorce.
Some claim that the trans acquisition officially started in 1994 at the Houston location of the Third Annual International Conference on Transgender Law and Employment Policy.
There, billionaire transgender trailblazer Martine Rothblatt warned attendees that they might have to wait another 20 years for their own liberation if they do n’t support the current gay, lesbian, and other queer rights issues being proposed.
Sniping the T has proven to be an uphill and largely casual battle in the US.
However, the cut has received more support from across the water.
For example, the LGB Alliance has been granted official donation position, holds yearly conferences, and is pleading with the British government to distinguish between T and LIGB in order to implement important census and data-gathering policies. Another British organizations, such as Find the L Out, have started marching in Pride marches while waving flags that read” Gay No Queer.”
The world’s educated health-care program, according to protesters, which encourages more attention and responsibilities when it comes to female problems, is one reason for their success in Britain.
Importantly, the legendary Tavistock Center, a children’s sex doctor funded by the NHS, closed last year in response to public outrage over medical treatments for transgender children.
Public support for the LGB ( sans T ) cause in Britain has also been aided by high-profile cases like that of Allison Bailey.
Bailey, a dark gay lawyer from London, prevailed in court last year after her legal team revealed that she had formally questioned her ability to change sex and was being investigated for transphobia.
According to Barker, the Bailey scenario represents the “broach no opposition” ethos that permeates every aspect of the trans discussion and has only served to alienate LGBs more.
Even so, some LGBs are perplexed by the media’s and LGBT organizations ‘ rapid adoption of transgender ideology, especially given how long it took for gay rights to gain traction.
Most importantly, trans people are most negatively impacted by the excessive emphasis on the transgender society in many ways.
According to Barker,” This whole discussion has put trans people under investigation they always wanted in the first place.” She continues,” This conflict is setting all again, whether they are LGB or T, so the time has come for a marriage.”
